Three Charged in Alleged Mortgage Fraud Scheme

July 29, 2010

Yesterday a federal grand jury sitting in New Haven, Connecticut, returned an 11-count indictment charging Steven J. Kottage, 44, and Genaro R. Hathaway, 46, both of Weston, and Mary Ellen Durso, 53, of Milford, with conspiracy and other offenses stemming from the individuals’ alleged involvement in mortgage fraud.

Keep in mind that when a grand jury returns an indictment, they have only heard the government’s version of the events. The grand jury has seen no evidence, has not heard from the individuals being investigated, and is not held to the reasonable doubt standard.

The indictment alleges that Kottage and Hathaway, who are married, conspired to commit wire fraud relating to a home on Fire Island, New York. Hathaway, a former attorney in Connecticut and New York, and Kottage purchased and financed the property in the name of Kottage’s mother by filing supposed false loan applications to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. In each instance, Hathaway served as the closing attorney on behalf of Kottage’s mother and Wells Fargo. The indictment further alleges that Hathaway subsequently purchased the property from Kottage’s mother’s estate in his own name and, in so doing, made a materially false loan application to H&R Block Home Mortgage to obtain a separate mortgage. Allegedly, rather than using the sale proceeds due and owing to Kottage’s mother’s estate to pay off the outstanding loans issued by Wells Fargo, Kottage and Hathaway used those proceeds to pay off an obligation arising from a separate real estate transaction in which Hathaway served as the closing attorney for the seller. The indictment alleges losses exceeding $500,000.

The indictment further alleges that Kottage, Hathaway, and Durso conspired to commit bank fraud by filing a materially false loan application to Washington Mutual to refinance a condominium in Hillsboro Beach, Florida. Supposedly, Durso served as the straw owner for the condo in order to obtain the fraudulent loan proceeds for the benefit of Kottage and Hathaway.

The indictment also charges Hathaway with tax evasion in 2005 and Durso with filing false tax returns from 2004 to 2008.

The indictment charges Kottage and Hathaway with two counts and Durso with one count of conspiracy, a charge that carries a maximum term of imprisonment of 30 years on each count. The indictment further charges Kottage and Hathaway with two counts of wire fraud, a charge that carries a maximum term of imprisonment of 30 years on each count. Kottage, Hathaway and Durso are each charged with one count of bank fraud, which carries a maximum term of imprisonment of 30 years. The one count of tax evasion against Hathaway carries a maximum term of imprisonment of five years, and the five counts of filing false tax returns against Durso carry a maximum term of imprisonment of three years, on each count.

What is interesting about this indictment is the fact that the government has attempted to throw in every charge they can think of against these individuals. It seems that once the government decided to indict the accused with the fraudulent scheme, they wanted to add as much into the indictment as possible, for example, the tax evasion and false tax return charges. The government wants to imprison these individuals for unrelated events, and unfortunately, if this case goes to trial and the accused are found guilty, the additional offenses will have a detrimental effect on the individuals’ ultimate sentence.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Former Financial Executives Indicted for Alleged Fraud Scheme

July 28, 2010

Three former financial services executives were indicted today for their alleged participation in fraud schemes and conspiracies related to bidding for contracts for the investment of municipal bond proceeds and other municipal finance contracts, the Department of Justice announced.

The 12-count indictment was filed yesterday in U.S. District Court in New York City. The indictment charges Dominick P. Carollo, Steven E. Goldberg, and Peter S. Grimm, all former executives at financial service companies or financial institutions, with participating in alleged wire fraud schemes and separate fraud conspiracies at various time periods from as early as 1999 until 2006.

The charged conspiracies and schemes all relate to the provision of a type of contract, known as an investment agreement, to public entities, such as state, county, and local governments and agencies throughout the United States. Major financial institutions, including banks, investment banks, insurance companies, and financial services companies are among the providers of investment agreements and other related municipal finance contracts. Public entities seek to invest money from a variety of sources, primarily the proceeds of municipal bonds that they issued to raise money for, among other things, public projects. Public entities typically hire a broker to conduct a competitive bidding process among various providers for the award of an investment agreement to invest such money. Competitive bidding for these agreements is the subject of regulations issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and is related to the tax-exempt status of the bonds.

The companies that employed Carollo, Goldberg, and Grimm all marketed financial products and services, including services as a provider of investment agreements. It is interesting to wonder, if the indicted individuals were in fact engaged in the alleged scheme, why wasn’t their employer aware and why was their behavior not discovered earlier? It seems that the government may have pieced this indictment together over a time period of several years in order to get the charges to stick and complete their version of the story.

The indictment alleges that Carollo, Goldberg, and Grimm conspired with various brokers to attempt to increase the number and profitability of investment agreements and other municipal finance contracts awarded to the provider companies where they were employed. According to court documents, Beverly Hills, California-based Rubin/Chambers, Dunhill Insurance Services Inc., also known as CDR Financial Products, was one of the alleged co-conspirator brokers. Supposedly, Carollo, Goldberg, and Grimm obtained from CDR and other alleged co-conspirator brokers information about the prices, price levels or conditions in competing providers’ bids, a practice known as a “last look,” which is explicitly prohibited by U.S. Treasury regulations. As a result of the information, allegedly, various providers won investment agreements and other municipal finance contracts at artificially determined price levels. In exchange for this information, Carollo, Goldberg, and Grimm submitted losing bids for certain investment agreements and other contracts when requested, and, on occasion, agreed to pay or arranged for kickbacks to be paid to CDR and other co-conspirator brokers.

The indictment also alleges that Carollo, Goldberg, Grimm, and co-conspirators misrepresented to municipal issuers or bond counsel that the bidding process was in compliance with U.S. Treasury regulations. This allegedly caused the municipal issuers to award investment agreements and other municipal finance contracts to providers that otherwise would not have been awarded the contracts if the issuers had true and accurate information regarding the bidding process. The alleged conduct affected the tax-exempt status of the underlying bonds.

According to court documents, the supposed efforts by Carollo, Goldberg, Grimm, and their co-conspirators to affect the bidding for investment contracts, and the execution of a variety of certifications that covered up their actions, also obstructed the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) ability to monitor compliance with U.S. Treasury regulations and impeded the IRS’s ability to determine whether municipal issuers had correctly accounted for any money that was owed to the U.S. Treasury.

Again, if the three individuals were in fact engaging in such a wide ranging and complex scheme, why was it not discovered until now, years after the scheme took place? The employers of the three individuals apparently did not notice any illegal behavior. The government is attempting to piece together their version of the story, but we will not really know what happened until the truth comes out at trial.

The fraud conspiracies with which Carollo, Goldberg, and Grimm are charged each carry a maximum penalty per count of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The wire fraud charges each carry a maximum penalty per count of 20 years in prison and a $1 million fine. Goldberg is charged with eight counts of conspiracy and two counts of wire fraud, Grimm is charged with five counts of conspiracy and one count of wire fraud, and Carollo is charged with four counts of conspiracy and one count of wire fraud. The maximum fines for each of these offenses may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

An indictment does not mean that the individuals are guilty, or even that they did anything wrong. In order for a grand jury to indict an individual, the government presents their biased story, without having to prove any evidence, and without the individual knowing they are under investigation. An indictment merely alleges the one sided views of the federal government. All individuals are innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


43 Defendants Charged in Alleged RICO Conspiracy

July 26, 2010

A criminal complaint was unsealed on Friday charging 43 defendants with participating in a federal racketeering (RICO) conspiracy. The RICO conspiracy alleged in the complaint involves the commission of both state and federal crimes, including murder, conspiracy to commit murder, kidnapping, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, robbery, conspiracy to commit robbery, drug trafficking and money laundering offenses. The complaint alleges that the defendants are members and associates of the Fernando Sanchez Organization (FSO), an offshoot of the Arellano-Felix drug-trafficking cartel.

The complaint also alleges that Jesus Quiñones Marques, the Director of International Liaison for the Baja California Attorney General’s Office, was aware of the FSO’s illegal activities and used his position to obtain confidential law enforcement information for the use of the FSO. The complaint further alleges that he was involved in making arrangements to have various rivals of the FSO arrested and detained by Mexican law enforcement officials.

The charges stem from a long-term investigation, entitled “Operation Luz Verde” (green light), conducted by the multi-agency San Diego Cross Border Violence Task Force (CBVTF), which was formulated to target those individuals involved in organized crime-related violent activities affecting both the United States and Mexico. Law enforcement personnel assigned to the CBVTF used court-authorized wiretaps and other investigative measures that led to the charges in this case.

Those charged under 18 U.S.C. 1962(d) include: Armando Villareal Heredia, age 32; Ruben Dario Castro Perez, age 35; Ivan Candelario Magana Heredia, age 33; Jose Alfredo Najera Gil, age 33; Carlos Cosme, age 34; Mario Escamilla, age 29; Ignacio Escamilla Estrada, age 49; Fausto Escamilla, age 25; Edgar Gustavo Escamilla, age 28; Jesus Quinones Marquez, age 49; Jose Antonio Ortega Nuno, age 44; Edgar Lopez De-Anda Daher, age 28; Jose Alejandro Florez Meza; Alicia Martinez, age 33; Juan Carlos Magana Heredia, age 29; Oscar Daniel Montoya Mora, age 28; Jorge Alberto Ponce; Mikael Daniel Blaser, age 20; Jonathan Valle, age 25; Armando Castillo, age 20; Omar Martinez, age 19; Enrique Salinas, Jr., age 26; Raul Moreno, age 23; Miguel Soria, age 19; Perla Carolina Jimenez, age 28; Luz Maria Benavidez Martinez, age 31; Bridgette Reynoso, age 23; Jorge Humberto Lora, age 31; Christopher Adrian Ruiz, age 36; Richard Gilbert Favela, age 26; Humberto Torres Mendoza, age 25; Juan Carlos Rique Aguirre, age 26; Telle Kreschmer, age 21; Hector Montes, age 23; Jose Contreras, age 28; Hassain Alzubaidy, age 25; Ivan Mora, age 21; Ulises Valenzuela, age 31; Benjamin Avendano, age 19; Jennifer Escamilla, age 26; Araceli Varela, age 33; Rocio Lopez, age 37; Kevin Luis, age 28.

A complaint is not evidence that the defendants committed the crimes charged. The defendants are presumed innocent until the government meets its burden in court of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Investment Firm Owner Pleads Guilty to Alleged $25 Million Ponzi Scheme

July 22, 2010

Donald Anthony Young, 38, of Palm Beach, Florida, pleaded guilty today to one count of mail fraud and one count of money laundering in connection with a $25 million fraud scheme, announced United States Attorney Zane David Memeger.

Supposedly, Young operated an investment advisory business in Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, which was known by various names including Acorn Capital Management II LP, Acorn Capital Management LLC, and Acorn II LP. He allegedly solicited individuals to invest with him, claiming that their funds would be invested in the stocks of large stable companies. The government claims that Young obtained more than $95 million from his investors, and instead of investing all of these funds as promised, Young allegedly diverted more than $25 million of investor funds for his own use, purchasing, among other things, homes for himself in Palm Beach, Florida, Coatesville, Pennsylvania, and Northeast Harbor, Maine. When investors requested redemptions, Young supposedly liquidated other investors’ funds to make the pay outs.

When the United States Securities and Exchange Commission opened an investigation into Young’s business, Young allegedly attempted to obstruct the investigation by providing false and misleading information to the SEC and by refusing to provide the SEC documents.

According to the indictment, Young laundered the proceeds of the supposed fraud by, among other things, acquiring investors’ funds and using these funds to purchase his home in Palm Beach, Florida.

Young faces a maximum possible sentence of 30 years’ incarceration, a possible fine, and restitution when sentenced on October 28, 2010. As part of most plea agreements, Young will most likely be forced to waive his right to an appeal.

Further, the judge will be able to consider all relevant acts during sentencing, even if Young did not plea guilty to such acts. In other words, even though Young only pleaded to one count of mail fraud and one count of money laundering, if the government is alleging that he orchestrated a $25 million dollar scheme, there must be other acts at play which the judge will be able to consider. This will probably affect his ultimate sentence.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Alabama Man Pleads Guilty to Bank Embezzlement

July 21, 2010

James E. Goldsborough, age 70, pled guilty today before United States Magistrate Judge Terry F. Moorer to a one-count felony information charging him with embezzling funds of PeoplesSouth Bank (“PSB”), in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 656, U.S. Attorney Leura G. Canary announced.

According to the plea agreement, Goldsborough worked for PSB in Dothan since 1992—first as president and, later, executive vice president. In these positions, Goldsborough had the authority to approve loans up to $25,000.

Allegedly, Goldsborough began embezzling in approximately 1992. He accomplished this by opening a bank account in the name of the fictitious entity. He would then approve loans to fictitious borrowers in amounts of $25,000 or less, deposit the loan proceeds in the account, and use the money either for personal expenses or to repay previously obtained fraudulent loans. Goldsborough would occasionally receive the loan proceeds in cash, falsely representing to the teller that he intended to personally deliver the funds to the borrower. Goldsborough classified the loans as commercial loans because there was no minimum monthly payment—the only requirement was that the loan be paid in full when due. When a loan would become due, Goldsborough would arrange for a new fictitious loan and use those funds to pay the loan that was due. Goldsborough also used his knowledge of PSB’s security procedures to avoid certain anti-fraud measures.

At the time Goldsborough’s embezzlement scheme was detected in August 2009, PSB’s records show that approximately 92 fictitious loans were outstanding with a total principal balance of approximately $1,850,999.23. However, under the plea agreement, Goldsborough reserves the right to argue that the amount is less for purposes of computing his sentence and the amount of restitution.

If Goldsborough continues with his plea, during sentencing he will face a statutory maximum sentence of 30 years’ imprisonment, a term of supervised release of no more than five years, a fine of up to $1,000,000 (or, if greater, twice the loss to PSB), and an order of restitution. Goldsborough has been released on a $25,000 unsecured bond pending sentencing.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Former Army Contracting Official Sentenced to Prison for Bribery Scheme

July 19, 2010

A former U.S. Army contracting official was sentenced today to 42 months in prison in connection with two schemes to solicit more than $30,000 in bribes and other payments from an Egyptian businessman in Kuwait, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Neil H. MacBride of the Eastern District of Virginia.

William Rondell Collins, 46, of Bartlett, Tenn., was also ordered by U.S. District Court Judge Liam O’Grady to forfeit $5,775, to pay a fine of $1,725 and to serve three years of supervised release following his prison term. Collins pleaded guilty on April 21, 2010, to one count of bribery and one count of unlawful salary supplementation. Collins was originally charged in an indictment filed on Feb. 18, 2010.

Collins was employed by the U.S. Army Area Support Group-Kuwait (ASG-KU). The ASG-KU is responsible for maintaining Camp Arifjan, a U.S. military installation providing support for operations in Afghanistan, Iraq and other locations in the Southwest Asian Theater. As part of those responsibilities, the ASG-KU maintains an off-post housing office, located in downtown Kuwait City, which procures, leases and supervises off-post housing for government employees and military service members stationed at Camp Arifjan. According to court documents, Collins worked in the ASG-KU’s off-post housing office as a housing specialist responsible for supervising private contractors and procuring off-post apartment rentals.

According to court documents, Collins agreed to submit an inflated off-post apartment lease to the United States for approval and then split with an Egyptian businessman more than $23,100 that resulted from the inflated lease payments. According to sentencing documents, Collins also solicited approximately $8,400 from the Egyptian businessman between July and December 2009 and agreed in return to provide advice and preferential treatment in connection with a fixed-price U.S. government contract awarded to the Egyptian businessman’s company. The contract was for maintenance services for off-post housing supervised by Collins and the ASG-KU off-post housing office.

The investigation was conducted by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI, the U.S. Army Criminal Investigative Division, and members of the National Procurement Fraud Task Force (NPFTF) and the International Contract Corruption Task Force (ICCTF).

The NPFTF, created in October 2006 by the Department of Justice, was designed to promote the early detection, identification, prevention and prosecution of procurement fraud associated with the increase in government contracting activity for national security and other government programs. The ICCTF is a joint law enforcement agency task force that seeks to detect, investigate, and dismantle corruption and contract fraud resulting from U.S. Overseas Contingency Operations worldwide, including in Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Texas Man Indicted for Bank Theft

July 19, 2010

A federal grand jury in Lubbock, Texas has indicted Lubbock resident Darrell Eugene Cartwright, 29, on one count of bank theft, announced U.S. Attorney James T. Jacks of the Northern District of Texas. Cartwright was arrested on June 18, 2010, on a charge outlined in a related federal criminal complaint and released on a personal recognizance bond.

According to the affidavit filed with the criminal complaint, on June 17, 2010, the Slaton, Texas Police Department advised the FBI that approximately $36,000 in cash had been stolen from the Citizens Bank in Slaton. They advised that the money had disappeared from a table in the bank. Cartwright, who had been working in the bank performing contract maintenance, was approached at his home later by law enforcement. He directed them to the missing cash. Cartwright advised that he found the money underneath the liner of a trash can in the men’s room of the bank.

An indictment is an accusation by a grand jury and a defendant is presumed innocent unless proven otherwise. Upon conviction, however, the bank theft count carries a maximum statutory sentence of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Twenty-four Indicted for Alleged $2.35 Million False Federal Tax Refund Scheme

July 16, 2010

Twenty-three new defendants are facing federal charges, along with a Skokie man who was arrested in April, alleging that they participated in a conspiracy since 2008 to claim more than $2.35 million in fraudulent federal income tax refunds and economic stimulus payments. All two dozen defendants allegedly shared the proceeds of Internal Revenue Service tax refunds, totaling more than $1.3 million, by withdrawing the tax funds deposited into co-defendants’ bank accounts, knowing that they were not entitled to the fraudulently obtained refunds.

Each of the 24 defendants was charged with one count of conspiracy to steal federal funds and defraud the IRS and one or more counts each of theft of government funds in one of two separate federal grand jury indictments that were unsealed after six of the defendants were arrested on Tuesday, federal law enforcement officials announced today.

The indictments followed the April arrest of Ovidiu Isac, 28, of Skokie, who allegedly directed the conspiracy. Isac and other defendants allegedly recruited co-conspirators to open bank accounts, withdraw the deposited tax refunds and stimulus payments, and share the proceeds.

The defendants arrested on Tuesday were Ovidiu Isac’s brother, Daniel Isac, 25, of Mount Prospect; Vasile George Husti, 19, of Chicago; John Pop, 25, of Bellevue, Wash., and formerly of Chicago; Marius Timofti, 26, of Chicago; and Cristian Talos, 31, and his wife, Virginia Talos, 27, both of Bothel Wash., and formerly of Chicago. All five were released on bond. Ovidiu Isac was previously released on bond. The remaining defendants will be arraigned at a later date in U.S. District Court in Chicago.

Also indicted were: Louis Lupancu, 22, of Chicago; Daniel Garbacz, 21, of Burbank; Miklos Ilyes, 47, of Chicago; Tomasz Mulica, 23, of Burbank; Costel Niculcea, 25, of Burbank; Stefan Valentin Niculcea, 28, of Burbank; Andrei Stanciu, 26, of Chicago; Ilie Stramturean, 26, of Chicago; Eugen Marius Szasz, 31, of Chicago; Marius Vainoras, 20, of Chicago Ridge; James McKibbin, 20, of Chicago; Bogdan Branisteanu, 28, of Chicago; Valeriu Soare, 27, of Skokie; Anca Andronache, 25, of Schiller Park; Maribel Juarez, 24, of Chicago; Simona Laba, 23, of Chicago; and Anuta Mihai, 26, of Arlington Heights.

According to the indictments, individual tax returns contained the names of Romanian nationals, including Romanian citizens who had traveled to the United States on J-1 exchange visitor visas. Allegedly, the returns included false W-2s showing employment income and false deductions, resulting in fraudulent claims for tax refunds. The indictments allege that for the tax years 2007, 2008 and 2009, more than 440 fraudulent tax returns were filed, directing the IRS to electronically deposit the refunds in bank accounts, primarily in the Chicago area.

Some of the defendants allegedly recruited individuals who agreed to open bank accounts, or use their existing bank accounts, to receive tax refunds and economic stimulus payments.

The conspiracy count carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine, and each count of theft of government funds carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. In addition, restitution is mandatory to the United States for the amount of tax refunds and stimulus payments fraudulently obtained. If convicted, the court is required to impose a reasonable sentence under the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines.

The indictments contain only charges and are not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Florida CEO Indicted for Alleged $880 Million Ponzi Scheme

July 15, 2010

A federal grand jury indicted Nevin Shapiro, former owner and chief executive officer of Capitol Investments USA Inc. (Capitol), today for allegedly overseeing a $880 million Ponzi scheme linked to his purported wholesale grocery distribution business, U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman announced.

The indictment charges Shapiro, 41, of Miami Beach, Fla., with using Capitol to solicit hundreds of millions of dollars from individuals who believed they were investing in Shapiro’s grocery distribution business. The indictment alleges that Capitol had no active wholesale grocery business during the relevant time period, and that Shapiro used new investor funds to make principal and interest payments to existing investors, as well as to fund his own lavish lifestyle.

Shapiro was previously charged by complaint and surrendered to special agents of the FBI and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on April 21, 2010, in Newark. He has been in federal custody since that time. The complaint charged Shapiro with one count each of securities fraud and money laundering; the indictment adds one count of conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud, two counts of wire fraud, and one count of money laundering. The indictment also seeks forfeiture of any money or property identified as proceeds from the offenses.

According to the indictment and other documents filed in this case in federal court in Newark, from January 2005 through November 2009, Shapiro allegedly solicited investors from New Jersey and throughout the United States through Capitol, telling them that he would use their money to fund his wholesale grocery distribution business. Allegedly, to induce those investors, Shapiro directed others to create and show to the investors documents fraudulently touting Capitol’s profitability. Those supposed documents included: financial statements profit and loss figures that fraudulently represented that Capitol’s wholesale grocery business was generating tens of millions of dollars in annual sales; personal and business tax returns for Shapiro and Capitol that also fraudulently reflected those sales; and numerous invoices fraudulently reflecting transactions between Capitol and other companies in the wholesale grocery business.

As a result of these alleged solicitations, more than 60 victim investors, including some from New Jersey, sent more than $880 million to Shapiro and Capitol during this time period. Beginning in January 2009, Shapiro and Capitol failed to make required principal and interest payments to investors. At the time, Shapiro purportedly told investors, among other things, that the payments were not being made because Capitol’s vendors were late in making payments, that Capitol was suffering from cash flow problems and that Shapiro’s accountant was on vacation.

Shapiro and Capitol were forced into bankruptcy in November 2009. At that time, they supposedly owed more than $100 million to victim investors.

If convicted, Shapiro faces the maximum potential penalty for each count in the indictment, which includes conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud (five years in prison; fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense); securities fraud (20 years in prison; fine of $5 million); wire fraud (20 years in prison; fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense) and money laundering (10 years in prison; fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense).

The charges and allegations made in the indictment are merely accusations, and the defendant is considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share


Operators of Colorado Medical Center Indicted for Alleged Health Care Fraud

July 12, 2010

Dilorom Asimova, age 50, of Aurora, Colorado, surrendered today to federal agents in Denver, and Terry Gardner, age 62, of Chesterfield, Missouri, was arrested July 8, 2010, by federal agents in St. Louis, based on a sealed grand jury indictment returned on May 17, 2010, charging both defendants with health care fraud.

According to the indictment, TJD Medical Center and Rehab was a Colorado corporation formed on August 19, 2003, by three individuals, including defendants Asimova and Gardner. TJD had two office locations, one in Wheat Ridge, and the other in Aurora. Asimova was the original registered agent, although that later was changed to Gardner being the registered owner. TJD was a medical practice which served both Medicare and Colorado Medicaid, as well as other private and government sponsored health insurance programs. TJD was allowed to submit Medicare claims for reimbursement electronically rather than by mail.

Gardner, the owner of TJD, is a licensed commercial airline pilot. He has also been a licensed physician in Colorado since May 25, 2001. Gardner could not dedicate his full-time employment to TJD because he was also working as a full-time commercial airline captain for Trans States Airlines based out of St. Louis, Missouri. At no time was Asimova a licensed doctor in Colorado or any other state in the U.S.

From October 2003, and continuing until February 2009, the indictment alleges that Asimova and Gardner did knowingly and willfully conspire with each other and others to execute a scheme to defraud Colorado Medicaid and Medicare programs in connection with the delivery of payment for health care benefits. The indictment further alleges that the two defendants made materially false statements and writings to Colorado Medicaid and Medicare in connection with the delivery of health care benefit payments.

Dilorom Asimova is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, 12 counts of health care fraud, and one count of making a false statement. Terry Gardner is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, 12 counts of health care fraud, and one count of making false statements in relation to a health care matter. If convicted of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, the defendants face not more than five years’ incarceration, and up to a $250,000 fine. If convicted of health care fraud, both defendants face not more than 10 years in federal prison, and a fine of up to $250,000, per count. If convicted of making a false statement, each defendant faces not more than five years’ imprisonment, and up to a $250,000 fine.

The charges contained in the indictment are allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation.

The author of this blog is Douglas McNabb. Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbferrari.com or a member of the firm at any location near you.

Bookmark and Share